Talk:Art

Art was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: June 28, 2018.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Art article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.

Article policies

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3

Art was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: August 16, 2006. (Reviewed version).

Art has been listed as a level-3 vital article in Art. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.

This subject is featured in the Outline of art, which is incomplete and needs further development.

edit · history · watch · refresh

To-do list for Art:

Add more inline citations.
Address the concerns noted in:
- "Value judgment" (WP:TOPIC)

Priority 1 (top)

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Visual arts

(Rated B-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

B

This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.

WikiProject Philosophy

(Rated B-class, High-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.

B

This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Public Art

(Rated B-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Public Art, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of public art on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

B

This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.

WikiProject Culture (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.

WikiProject Arts

(Rated B-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

B

This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.5 / Vital / Core

(Rated C-class, High-importance)

This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.

C

This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Accessibility: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> \| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Additional information:

	This article is within of subsequent release version of Arts.
	This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
	This article is a vital article.
	This article is one of the core set of articles every encyclopedia should have.

This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 30 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Richard Wollheim's distinctions[edit]

Richard Wollheim's distinctions of views on art as either 'realistic', 'objectivistic' or 'relativistic' may be said to be pertaining to, even symptomatic of the predominantly anglo-american school of Analytic philosophy, as opposed to the Continental philosophy; the proposed other major stream in the currents of occidental philosophy. If this is acknowledged it is problematic that the wikipedia article on art, in its current reading, frames art in this fashion. That is predominantly because of the current position in the article of Richard Wollheims distinctions . I will argue that it is at odds with the neutrality policy. In the extension of this argument, one should seek to adapt the habit of adressing the cultural position of information. This can be done in a simple and elegant way without problem; for instant. in the context of analytical philosophy, Richard Wollheim suggests three different views on arts practices...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xact (talk • contribs) 12:16, 23 September 2009

Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Meow calico (talk) 22:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 22:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Purpose/Motivated functions, item 9: Please change "evolutionary important" to "evolutionarily important" because grammatical error. 79.71.173.140 (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Done NiciVampireHeart 23:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

REDIRECT [[

Header text	Header text	Header text
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example

]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.16.195.252 (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

anhducwiki

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Talk:Art

Talk:Art

Richard Wollheim's distinctions[edit]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2018[edit]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2019[edit]

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Tools

Print/export

Languages

No comments:

Post a Comment