Talk:Bertrand Russell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleBertrand Russell was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 2, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 19, 2005Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
October 28, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
April 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bertrand Russell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

A Wikipedia Entry or a Hagiography[edit]

It behoves the authors to add a section, however small, that contains some criticisms. At the very least, he displayed an ignorance of the nature of the Olympic gods and misunderstood what the Greeks meant when then talked about them/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.135 (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Error en la biografía?[edit]

"he asked the philosopher John Stuart Mill to act as Russell's secular godfather.[80] Mill died the year after Russell's birth".

According to that statement, Russel was at most two years old when he made that petition... is that correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jose Icaza (talkcontribs) 18:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Agnostic[edit]

In the very short section on "Religion", the article says that Russell described himself as "an agnostic" and that he regarded religion as "little more than superstition." He was a Humanist. Does this really justified all the Categories he has as "Critics of ..."? Why do we limit ourselves to Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and the Catholic Church? Why not also Category:Critics of Buddhism, etc.? These categories look to me a bit like WP:SYNTH. One might expect to see open criticism or hostility to specific religions or denominations. But there is none. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Most of them seem to have been added by a single-purpose categorization editor, without explanation. Critics of religion and Christianity remain after another editor reverted. Since Russell wrote Why I Am Not a Christian, it is probably fine to retain Criticism of Christianity, though more information supporting the category would be a benefit. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Republican?[edit]

Is there actually a reliable source which verifies Russell was a republican? The Category:British republicans has been added, but I can't find evidence of this. -- TrottieTrue (talk) 00:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)