Talk:Fuel cell
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fuel cell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. | |||
|
| Article policies | |
Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL | |||
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4 | |||
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
| ||||
Threads older than 2 months may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Update article[edit]
this article can be update by fr.wikipedia version.
O2-[edit]
In the article, there are some reactions using O2-, where in aqueous solutions I would expect OH-. Maybe this is just a short-cut, where everyone knows how it works, though I believe here it would be nice not to take such short cuts. Gah4 (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Various bus experiments[edit]
Hi, @Ssilvers:. That seems like a lot of information to delete. If you think it's too much detail for the main fuel cell article, I wonder whether moving it to a separate article on, say, "fuel cell bus experiments" might be appropriate. PRRfan (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- What I deleted was ancient information about projects that were discontinued by 2005. There already is a separate article about it, Fuel Cell Bus Club. I added instead, current information from the NREL. I can't imagine why you would delete. Also, I can't understand why you would delete the word "commentators", which gives at least some color to the extremely vague "some". Also, why substitute "said" for the literally correct "stated", since they stated it in writing, rather than verbally. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- The newer info from NREL is, of course, welcome; "commentators" adds no useful distinction; and "said" is shorter, less stuffy, and no less accurate than "stated", which of course is also used for verbal statements. But to my main point here, if all that info is at Fuel Cell Bus Club, then I have no objection to removing it. PRRfan (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Duplication of PEMFC material[edit]
I was looking into PEM fuel cells and noticed that there is a large description on PEMFCs both at Proton-exchange membrane fuel cell and here. I'm new to editing Wikipedia but happy to help: how does the community feel this would be best resolved? Richardcw (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- This article should basically contain a section that is a good summary of the other article, and at the top of the section, there should be a cross-reference that would look like this: {{main article|Proton-exchange membrane fuel cell}} Also, if there is anything good in the PEMFC section of this article that is missing from the other article, it should be copied there. For more information, see WP:SUMMARY. Happy editing, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2020[edit]
Was the Pike prediction correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.224.129 (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- B-Class Chemistry articles
- Mid-importance Chemistry articles
- WikiProject Chemistry articles
- B-Class energy articles
- High-importance energy articles
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- B-Class electrical engineering articles
- Mid-importance electrical engineering articles
- Electrical engineering articles
- B-Class Environment articles
- High-importance Environment articles
- Sustainability task force articles
- B-Class physics articles
- B-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- Mid-importance physics articles
No comments:
Post a Comment