Talk:Dominion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dominion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. | |||
| Article policies | ||
Archives: 1, 2, 3 | |||
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, realise, defence, artefact), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
WikiProject British Empire | (Rated C-class) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Perform a search for extra information and sources to help build the Dominion article by clicking on these links: Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL |
List of Dominions[edit]
Why is Malta listed as a "Dominion" as in only achieved independence in 1964, so belongs to the later period where there is so much debate about "Commonwealth Realms"?
Also with regard to Newfoundland, I understand that it was entitled to the title Dominion from the 1907 Colonial Conference, but did not officially adopt the title until 1917 Colonial Conference. The 1907 Conference described the members as "Dominions" instead of colonies. New Zealand adopted the title later that year (by Royal Decree) as listed, but there is nothing to show that Newfoundland made such a change. Interestingly the 1907 conference also included all four South African provinces, so that within 5 years of the end of the Boer War, the two Boer states of Transvaal and the Orange Free State were treated by the British government as "Dominions". However the South African provinces never assumed such separate status prior to the Union of South Africa 1910. 09:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Ellis (talk • contribs)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Dominion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927193413/http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0001798 to http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0001798
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930041441/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=J1ARTJ0002344 to http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=J1ARTJ0002344
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=98F - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130614204312/http://www.therepublicofrumi.com:80/archives/56_01.htm to http://therepublicofrumi.com/archives/56_01.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722144933/http://foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=48 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=48
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722212926/http://foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=12 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=12
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050716075624/http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=96 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=96
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051029151124/http://www.law.ualberta.ca:80/ccskeywords/constitutional_acts.html to http://www.law.ualberta.ca/ccskeywords/constitutional_acts.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051104044241/http://www.law.ualberta.ca:80/ccskeywords/index.html to http://www.law.ualberta.ca/ccskeywords/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051017043704/http://prayerbook.ca:80/library/machray/issue5/machray5d.htm to http://www.prayerbook.ca/library/machray/issue5/machray5d.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Dominion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110601183454/http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=49 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=49
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831094018/http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=52 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=52
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lac-bac.gc.ca/confederation/023001-2085-e.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060404054411/http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002344 to http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002344
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://therepublicofrumi.com/archives/56_01.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.law.ualberta.ca/ccskeywords/constitutional_acts.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.law.ualberta.ca/ccskeywords/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060404054411/http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002344 to http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002344
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://prayerbook.ca/library/machray/issue5/machray5d.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Use of term 'Dominion' earlier in English history[edit]
The act integrating Wales into England in 1543 refers to the Dominion of Wales and His Majesty's other dominions - see a quote in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_in_Wales_Acts_1535_and_1542#The_Acts_and_the_Welsh_language
and the term continued to be used until 1800 according this claim in Parliament
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1934/nov/05/wales-title-of-dominion
so there's more history here than the article currently reflects. Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
The Dominion of New England was established in an attempt to take away power form the New England Commonwealth colonies. Such as The Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Massachusetts still retains the name Commonwealth of Massachusetts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:78CB:A300:6DC0:FB21:BD13:889C (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Colonial Conference of 1907[edit]
"The assertiveness of the self-governing colonies was recognised in the Colonial Conference of 1907, which implicitly introduced the idea of the Dominion as a self-governing colony by referring to Canada and Australia as Dominions."
If they were already self-governing colonies, then the idea of the Dominion must have implicitly introduced them as being something more than that. Any thoughts? Chocoholic2017 (talk) 03:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
No comments:
Post a Comment